Thursday, September 19, 2019

Indonesian Censors Think ‘SpongeBob SquarePants’ is Too Violent and Sexual

After censoring Sandy the squirrel’s bikini, the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission is sanctioning a network that broadcasts the show for other peculiar reasons.


The Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) is now going after Nickelodeon's beloved animated series SpongeBob SquarePants for depicting what it deems to be violent and sexual situations.

The KPI sanctioned the television network Global TV for airing The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie, the blockbuster 2004 movie inspired by the hit animated series, on August 22, 2019 because SpongeBob is shown throwing a tart at another character’s face. The commission also called out the airing of Rabbids Invasion, another animated Nickelodeon series, during a SpongeBob time slot on August 6, 2019 because it contained "cartoonish violence".

Global TV received a written warning and must comply with a censorship order. It’s still unclear whether SpongeBob will disappear entirely from Indonesian TV, or if it will be just the movie.

In a press release, KPI Deputy Head Mulyo Hadi Purnomo said that he found violations related to violence, demonic possession, “horror” scenes, “spirit summoning,” sensual dialog and movements, and abuse of certain groups in various SpongeBob broadcasts.

“The Commission must pay attention to the conditions of violations and the limitation of programs with sexual content. Broadcasts may not contain content that pushes teenagers to act inappropriately or justify such behavior as being acceptable,” Purnomo said.

The KPI’s statement was immediately met with backlash by Indonesian netizens, but this isn’t the first time that the Commission has attacked SpongeBob; at one point, they blurred out Sandy the squirrel’s bikini.

SpongeBob SquarePants, which is currently celebrating its 20th anniversary, has been the target of moralists worldwide long before the KPI got involved. For instance, in 2005, American conservative Christian group Focus on the Family attacked the show and called it a “pro-gay propaganda tool,” which led to speculation on SpongeBob’s sexual orientation. Two years later, creator Stephen Hillenburg declared the character to be asexual.

A study published in 2011 by the University of Virginia found that after nine minutes of watching SpongeBob, the cognitive abilities of 4-year-olds were significantly disturbed compared to kids the same age who watched other programs. Nickelodeon was quick to denounce those findings, claiming that the study relied on “questionable methods.”

SpongeBob has continuously been accused of countless outlandish things, including demonising large corporations and supporting left-wing ideas. But those critics are probably forgetting why millions of people love the character: he radiates optimism in an increasingly pessimistic world. After all, what else is SpongeBob known for if not his “imagination?”


Screenshot via YouTube

The KPI has been criticised for its censorship in the past. In 2016, it banned all depictions of LGBTQ characters on TV. More recently in August, the KPI announced plans to monitor Netflix and YouTube content, even though they admitted that they don’t actually have the right to monitor online content. This, even though Indonesian “charity” shows like Bedah Rumah (House Operation) and Uang Kaget (Cash Surprise), which exploit poverty for views, have evaded KPI sanctions.

Original source: VICE.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Have your say by leaving a comment below! NickALive! welcomes friendly and respectful comments. Please familiarize with the blog's Comment Policy before commenting. All new comments are moderated and won't appear straight away.